November 08, 2002

Unintended Consequences, by John Ross

Over the next few weeks, I'll be stocking this new site with recommendations I've been wanting to make en masse somewhere... and this is the place. I've already mentioned Boston's Gun Bible in my opening salvo, so I'd be remiss not to follow up immediately with John Ross' Unintended Consequences.
Unintended Consequences, by John Ross
I've never used this comparison with any other work, but I'm not the first to call it "the Atlas Shrugged of the gun freedom movement". As a matter of fact, Vin Suprynowicz is quoted saying so himself on the book's dustcover: "A modern novel of liberty to rival Rand's Atlas Shrugged... a masterwork." So, there you go... I stand in good company making such a bold comparison.

I should add that our own Dr. Edgar Suter proclaims on the same dustcover: "The most important work of fiction I have read in over a decade." There, I've shamelessly dropped friends' names to bolster my own already heady feelings about this work.

At 862 pages of small type on large pages, the novel rivals Rand's wordcount. Some people are put off by that, but I'm one of those people who loves this kind of Big American Novel. I'm also one who really likes the fact that it's what I've heard described as "a technical manual masquerading as a novel". It's not masquerading as such, it's blatantly such. Like Atlas Shrugged, it's an epic novel of ideas, sweeping a century's history seen through the lens of the gun rights movement. The technical manual characterization is a true one, and a big selling point: it's an in-depth crash course in gun culture, combat mindset, and the care & feeding of personal arms.

The centerpiece narrative of this work is the plight, flight, and fight of protagonist Henry Bowman, a self-made millionaire geologist cum petroleum prospector consultant who finds himself on the victim end of the BATF stick. Much of the book's early plotline, however, is taken up in historical narrative, a great deal of which is a compelling dramatization of the events of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, as well as another narrative surrounding the events leading up to the pivotal 1939 United States v Miller decision.

This is not a book for the faint of heart. It's not a limped-wristed attempt to justify private gun ownership from the "sporting arms" angle favored by the national NRA. It's a full-blooded celebration of the fundamental human, civil, and constitutionally protected individual right, the right to self-defense.

Posted by Russell Whitaker at November 8, 2002 12:09 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Diamond,

Regardless of McVeigh had to say, I'm much rather invoke words uttered by people who are not mass-murdering fanatics to back my own arguments.

If the government didn't put that bloody twit up to the Job, they might as well have, given the harm he did to the cause of us who believe in individual rights and individual responsibility. McVeigh deserved the death he got.

Posted by: Russell Whitaker on April 30, 2003 05:14 PM

Hi David,

Did you mean "book" when you said "file"? To my knowledge, UC was only published as a book.

Speaking of which, I've heard rumors a sequel is in the works. Unconfirmed.

Posted by: Russell Whitaker on May 17, 2003 10:55 AM

I was never a big supporter of "guns", but after reading this book I became angry and maybe even scared and now I am much more leary of my government.

Posted by: Shannon on February 9, 2004 09:43 PM

I am reading this book now for the second time. My family had a Federal Firearms License and the BATF revoked it. We lost all of the guns we owned. This book is very strongly written and I believe that this type of situation is forseeable in the distant future.

Posted by: Josh on February 19, 2004 07:03 AM

All of you good people should also read these books:
"Mindhunter" -by John Douglas, senior profiler of the FBI
"The Serpent and the Rainbow" -Interesting information on the only succesful mass slave revolt in Haiti

See also: www.freestateproject.org
www.northtothefuture.org

The final battle is on! Will we lose everything, or start taking politics seriously? Meaning, will Libertarians begin to run and win in elections requiring under 20,000 votes? Or do they want to be big fish in small ponds & internet debates forever?

That's the choice we face. Get serious now, or take a lesson from Henry Bowman.

-J

Posted by: Jake Witmer on March 13, 2004 04:22 AM

klm kleding bedrijfskleding

Posted by: klm kleding bedrijfskleding on March 18, 2007 05:16 AM
Post a comment














Enter this code below: