November 19, 2002

Seasteading: an introduction

Like many libertarians, I've always wanted to live someplace free, and have been unhappy at not finding one. I've followed the nation founding movement with interest, and quite a bit of skepticism. In fact, my critical webpage about the Freedom Ship earned me my first threatened lawsuit. I also have a page of collected nation founding links, (which may be a little out of date at this point).

I am passionate enough about the subject to have considered trying to start my own new country project. My plan was to watch, gather information, learn useful skills, and eventually join or start a realistic venture. I didn't expect that to happen for a decade, but after a couple years I found Wayne Gramlich's first seastead paper. I was struck by the practicality of his thinking, which stood in stark contrast to most of what I had seen. Conveniently, he lived a couple miles away, and we began collaborating, along with Andy, an engineer.

The project is still in development, but I'll provide a quick sketch here of what makes seasteading realistic. There are several keys: proven technologies, scalability, and size, each of which is related to lessons learned from other failed ventures.

We are depending on proven technologies, not OTEC (which is currently experimental and requires huge plants to attain net positive energy generation) or seacrete (which is quite expensive when you use the correct figures, 0.1 lb/kwhr, not 4.2). The hull is made from ferrocement, power is generated by a combination of wind turbines, PV panels, and gas generators. This design turns out to be relatively inexpensive per unit area.

Lack of scalability is a classic mistake made by projects such as the Freedom Ship. Their structures are huge and monolithic, which means that in order to make them happen, vast capital is required. It also means that they are vulnerable to destruction by natural or human means. Big things usually appear in this world by growing from small things: "Rome wasn't built in a day". The way to make a tremendous vision happen is to bootstrap it and make sure that each level can create the next, like an inductive proof in mathematics.

Finally, modesty in goals of size is another strong factor in realism. Some other projects have looked for 100 - 1,000 times as much money as our first self-sufficient design is projected to cost. Frankly, we find them ludicrous. The only place you'll find the word "billion" used by seasteaders is in talking about other ventures. In order to have a sea city, we must start with a sea village.

Our research and designs are still under development, and we want our plans to be solid before we start with the mailing lists and fancy websites and all that. Check back in a few months, and be assured that we are plugging away in the meantime. Our first prototype will not be huge, but it will be buildable. We think actual implementation is the most exciting part of any vision.

Posted by Patri Friedman at November 19, 2002 12:05 AM | TrackBack
Comments

So why the reluctance to partake in the seasteading movement that already exists? An independent lifestyle at see can already be had. Two great books come to mind. Sailing the Farm by Ken Neumeyer is good, but out of print. Better yet is SEA-STEADING by Jerome FitzGerald, who teaches classes on the topic. I suppled a url to their site and e-mail to their site.

Posted by: Jackson on March 3, 2006 05:38 PM

As a mariner of many years,one of the most interestintg and applicable concepts for a sea= stead is that of a spud boat ie one with stilts passing thru the hull to moor you on an uneven sea floor .Once down and gripped. the hull is then jacked up so there is no pitching or rolling in normal seastates.These were used to provide stable survey platforms in the bayou-swamps of Louisiana
larger barges have similar pipes thru hull but are not jacked =rather they are pinned at high tide.

Posted by: Robert on July 23, 2006 10:12 AM
Post a comment














Enter this code below: